Ask a Question

You visited our site and still have questions? Feel free to contact us

Consultation and guidance given not in the framework of service does not serve as a replacement for a physician’s examination or consultation, and is not considered a “medical diagnosis” or “medical opinion". In all cases of urgency, distress or emergency (physical and/or mental), seek medical care with a family doctor, closest emergency room, and/or ambulatory service.   

Contact Us


Terms of use

Medix FTP Service (the "Service") is designed to provide you with an easy way to transfer files relevant to the management of your case to Medix Medical Services Europe Limited ("Medix", "we" and "us").


The following terms and conditions together with the Medix Information Security Policy (which may be found at http://medix- (together, the "Terms of Service"), form the agreement between you and us in relation to your use of the Service. You should read the Terms of Service carefully before agreeing to them. If you do not understand any part of the Terms of Services, then please contact us at for further information. You acknowledge and agree that by clicking on the "Upload" button, you are indicating that you accept the Terms of Services and agree to be bound by them.


Using the Service


In order to use the Service, you will be required to log in by submitting your member number which was provided to you by the Medix staff, your name and e-mail address. Once you have logged in, you will be able to upload files to the Service. We will download your files to our system and no copy will be retained on the server used to provide the Service. For detailed upload instructions, please click here.


Protection of your information


We take the safeguarding of your information very seriously. In order to prevent unauthorised access or disclosure of your information we have put in place appropriate physical, electronic and administrative procedures to safeguard and secure the files you upload to the Service. However, no method of transmission over the internet, or method of electronic data storage is 100% secure and while we have put in place appropriate protections, we cannot guarantee the security of information you upload to the Service.


Quality and availability of the Service


While we make reasonable efforts to provide the Service, it is provided "as is" with no representation, guarantee or warranty of any kind as to its availability, functionality, that it will meet your requirements or that it will be free of errors or viruses.


We will not be responsible for any damage to your computer system or the computer system of any third party resulting from your use of the Services where such damage is caused by circumstances which are beyond our reasonable control.


I agree
Contact Us
Contact Us
HomeTestimonials Decision MakingRevised Diagnosis Prevented Unnecessary Surgery

Revised Diagnosis Prevented Unnecessary Surgery

While an orthopedist advised I to consider undergoing knee replacement surgery. Medix recommended a conservative treatment only

I., a generally fit and healthy gentleman used to play a lot of rugby, which left him with a number of degenerative changes in both his knees. He has undergone arthroscopies on both his knees however despite the treatments, he still had trouble walking long distances.

On August 2012, while riding his bicycle, I. was involved in a traffic accident during which he fell off the bicycle. It resulted in a fractured hip that was fixed with 3 pins. His right leg was shortening and he went through a lot of pain that led him to limping.


Six months later, a local orthopedic surgeon saw I. and advised that based on his recent CT, his hip had healed nicely and as such he should consider undergoing knee replacement surgery.


I. turned then to Medix for advice. After reviewing the x-ray, Medix orthopedic consultant disagreed with the local orthopedic assessment: He observed that the fracture in the hip had not united properly and suspected that it might
not unite at all based on the CT which showed a complete non-union. Following this realization, the orthopedic consultant was reluctant to recommend knee replacement surgery prior to satisfactory resolution of the hip condition.


Upon our request I. was referred to an orthopedic surgeon in London who agreed that the hip fracture has not united. He too did not think that I. was at a stage where knee replacement was indicated. Given his young age and activity profile, he stated that he ought to carry on with his hip and knee as they were at the time and be treated with conservative treatment only. Currently, I. is feeling better.

By continuing to use this site you consent to the use of cookies on your device as described in our cookie policy unless you have disabled them. You can change your cookie settings at any time but parts of our site will not function correctly without them.